Some fundamental RFCs were officially adopted as standards. The reason behind this is that the individuals or groups working on an RFC primarily use their time to improve protocols, and not for the standardisation process.
The first published RFCs open up technical matters for discussion. Techopedia Terms. Connect with us. Sign up. Term of the Day. Best of Techopedia weekly.
News and Special Offers occasional. Internet technology experts may submit an Internet Draft without support from an external institution. Standards-track RFCs are published with approval from the IETF, and are usually produced by experts participating in working groups, which first publish an Internet Draft.
This approach facilitates initial rounds of peer review before documents mature into RFCs. Each protocol is assigned a status of "Required," "Recommended," "Elective," "Limited Use," or "Not Recommended," in descending order of priority.
Only a very few essential protocols are ever labeled "Required,". My GK. Checkout Cart Loading Create an Account Forgot Your Password? Access MyGK. Date: Sep.
Some RFCs are informational and others are published Internet standards. The final version of the RFC becomes the standard and is published with a number. No further comments or changes are permitted for the final version.
0コメント